Heart
Disease Still Killing Millions of Women. [United States] Angioplasty, bypass surgery
and cholesterol-lowering medications are among the many interventions that have brought a
sharp decrease in heart disease deaths in recent years. But, as Dr. Sharon Hayes of the
Mayo Clinic points out, there is one big problem. The death rates in women have not
declined as much as they have in men, she says. The latest statistics show a
shocking difference. |
Study: Stitches Bar Female
Bladder Problems. [United States] A few well-placed stitches can prevent bladder
problems in tens of thousands of women each year who have surgery to fix sagging internal
organs, a new study suggests. ''It's a very common problem in women, and this is the first
time we've been able to demonstrate that an operation can actually prevent urinary
incontinence,'' said Dr. Linda Brubaker of Loyola University, who led the study. Results
were published in today's New England Journal of Medicine. The nationwide, federally
funded study was stopped early because the benefits were so clear. It involved 322 women
having surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, an uncomfortable condition that is basically a
hernia of the vagina. Frequent childbirth increases the chances of this, and about 200,000
women a year have surgery for it. But the operation, which consists of implanting mesh to
hold the vagina in place, often unveils underlying bladder control problems. Doctors
wanted to see whether adding a second step, called the Burch procedure, could prevent
this. |
Estrogen
Therapy Boosts Clotting Risk in Postmenopausal Women. [United States] Estrogen therapy
appears to increase the risk of blood clots in the veins of postmenopausal women who have
had their uterus removed. These latest results from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI)
were unexpected, even to the study's lead author. "It surprised us all how few
benefits have come out of this and how many negatives," said Dr. J. David Curb, a
professor of geriatric medicine at the University of
Hawaii and president/director of the
Pacific Health Research Institute, both in Honolulu. "This is not where I would have
predicted we would be. I was a believer [that estrogen would not increase the risk of
blood clots]. The data have convinced me that I was wrong." The risk is still less
than that of estrogen plus progestin, the combination hormone therapy given if a woman
still has her uterus. The study appears in the April 10 issue of the Archives of Internal
Medicine. |
Two Breast Cancer Studies
Question Old Treatments. [United
States]
Two important studies published Wednesday
challenge conventional thoughts about treating and avoiding breast cancer. One suggests
doctors may eventually be able to identify women who do not need chemotherapy. The other
says women who have had hysterectomies can take estrogen to relieve symptoms of menopause
without increasing their risk of breast cancer. The first study, published in the Journal
of the American Medical Association, indicates that many of the 70 percent of women whose
cancers are fed by estrogen get so much benefit from estrogen-blocking hormonal therapy
that chemotherapy provides few if any additional advantages. The caveat, though, is that
there is as yet no reliable way to identify the women who may not need chemotherapy from
those who would be helped by it. Currently, guidelines call for women to get chemotherapy
if their tumors are of a certain size. The second paper, also published Wednesday in the
Journal of the American Medical Association, involved a U.S. government study of more than
10,700 healthy women whose uteruses had been removed. The question was: What are the
health consequences of taking estrogen for the relief of menopausal symptoms? The new
report does not apply to most menopausal women, but only to those who have had
hysterectomies. In this case, the Women's Health Initiative found that estrogen did not
increase the women's risk of breast cancer. But they did have more abnormal mammograms
results, usually requiring that the test be repeated, and more breast biopsies. The study
ended early, at the end of February 2004, when the investigators found that estrogen
increased the risk of strokes and of blood clots in the legs. The study also found that
estrogen taken alone increased the risk of dementia in women over age 65, decreased the
risk of hip fractures and had no effect on heart disease. But the question of estrogen's
effects on breast cancer risk had been uncertain until now, when the women had been
followed for seven years. The results in women with hysterectomies contrast with those
from another arm of the study involving women who had not had hysterectomies and who took
estrogen and progesterone. In that case the hormone combination led to more breast cancer
and more heart disease. It remains a puzzle why estrogen, which can fuel the growth of
many breast cancers, did not increase the breast cancer risk in this study. |
Osteoporosis Drug Shown to
Decrease Chances of Breast Cancer. [United States] A drug already in widespread use to
prevent bone thinning in women past menopause can also reduce their risk of invasive
breast cancer, researchers reported. The drug is raloxifene, sold as Evista. It is the
second drug found to reduce the risk of breast cancer. The first was tamoxifen, whose
brand name is Nolvadex, which is approved to treat breast cancer and also prevent it in
women at high risk for the disease. A study, sponsored by the U.S.-based National Cancer
Institute and released Monday, has found that raloxifene works as well as tamoxifen in
women at high risk for breast cancer, and that it may have fewer side effects. In those
cases, each drug halves the risk of invasive breast cancer. "We feel raloxifene is
the winner of this trial," said Dr. D. Lawrence Wickerham, associate chairman of the
National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, which coordinated the experiment.
Other experts said it was not clear whether raloxifene had significant advantages over
tamoxifen. Although raloxifene reduces the risk of invasive breast cancer, it does not
reduce the risk of an earlier form of the disease that can become invasive if it is not
caught in time. Tamoxifen cuts that risk in half. Raloxifene has Food and Drug
Administration approval to treat just osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Its maker, Eli
Lilly, is expected to apply for additional permission to market it for breast cancer
prevention in high- risk postmenopausal women. Because it is already sold, doctors can
prescribe it as they see fit, the common practice called "off-label" use.
Raloxifene and tamoxifen can cause significant side effects, including small increases in
risk of uterine cancer and blood clots and menopausal symptoms. |
Drug Found
to Cut Risk of Breast Cancer. [United States] A drug used to treat osteoporosis
reduced the risk of breast cancer by half among women predisposed to develop the disease,
according to data released Monday. The drug, known as raloxifene and sold under the brand
name Evista, worked as well as tamoxifen, the only drug approved to lower the risk of
breast cancer. Women taking raloxifene also had fewer serious side effects than those on
tamoxifen. ''This is really good news for women,'' said Dr. Leslie Ford, a National Cancer
Institute researcher who was one of the study's leaders. ``It's a drug that's already used
by 500,000 women for treatment and prevention of osteoporosis, and now we have an
additional benefit.'' In the seven-year study, researchers followed nearly 20,0000
post-menopausal women whose age, family history and medical history put them at high risk
for breast cancer. The women, whose average age was 58, were randomly assigned to take
tamoxifen or raloxifene. Researchers announced the results Monday. In both groups, roughly
20 women per thousand developed breast cancer -- about half the rate that would be
expected without treatment. Both drugs are known to increase the risk of blood clots, and
the rate of strokes and heart attacks was the same in both groups. |
Many
Cancer Survivors Stop Mammographies. [United
States] More than a third of breast
cancer survivors gradually stop getting annual mammographies, according to a new study.
The results may indicate women grow complacent about medical screening once they get past
the medical scare, said the study's lead author, Dr. Chyke Doubeni
of the University of Massachusetts.
Others said it's more likely survivors avoid screenings because they dread a recurrence of
the cancer and additional treatment. "They're fearful something's going to be
found," said Dr. Kathryn Edmiston, a Worcester,
Mass., oncologist who specializes in
breast cancer patients. The study found just 63 percent of women were getting annual
mammographies five years after breast cancer surgery. The findings are reported in Cancer,
a medical journal published by the Atlanta-based American Cancer Society. About 2.3
million U.S. women have
been treated for breast cancer, and they are considered to be at
three times the risk for tumors in the other, unaffected breast than women with no such
medical history. |
Deaths After RU-486.
[United States]
Reports that up to six American and one Canadian women have died after
pill-induced abortions in recent years are making the regimen based on RU-486 look a lot
less attractive than once thought. Conservatives in Congress and anti-abortion
organizations are demanding that RU-486 be withdrawn from the market. That seems premature
given the uncertainties and small number of deaths in a still-unfolding story. But women
seeking an abortion will need to weigh the risks and benefits carefully before deciding
which method to choose. Based on admittedly shaky data, pill-induced or medical abortions
look riskier and less certain to fully terminate a pregnancy than surgical abortions. The
deaths after medical abortions, though very rare, have some alarming and puzzling
characteristics. Most of the women were healthy, had apparently successful abortions, died
within a week of the procedure and were infected with a dangerous bacterium. The women
first took oral doses of RU-486, also known as Mifeprex, followed two days later by a
second drug, misoprostol, to help expel the fetus. But, in a departure from the regimen
approved by the Food and Drug Administration, they were allowed to insert the second drug
into their vaginas at home - at a higher dose than first recommended - instead of taking
it orally in a doctor's office. Those changes and others were justified by scientific
analyses that the new regimen would be safe and effective and could be used later in a
pregnancy. But the deaths suggest that the changes may have been imprudent. Health
authorities will need to sort out which drug, if either, might be at fault, whether
vaginal insertion is to blame and whether changes in a family of bacteria have made them
more lethal. Meanwhile, women who live in areas where surgical abortions are hard to
obtain or who simply prefer pills to surgery should be alert to any symptoms of illness
after a medical abortion. The danger is slight but for a few women could be catastrophic.
|
Pregnant
Robot Tests Medical Talents. [United
States] Noelle's given birth in Afghanistan, California
and dozens of points in between. She's a lifelike, pregnant robot used in increasing
numbers of medical schools and hospital maternity wards. The full-sized, blond, pale
mannequin is in demand because medicine is rapidly abandoning centuries-old training
methods that use patients as guinea pigs, turning instead to high-tech simulations. It's
better to make a mistake on a $20,000 robot than a live patient. The Institute of Medicine,
an arm of the National Academy of Sciences, estimates that
as many as 98,000
U.S. patients
die annually from preventable medical errors. "We're trying to engineer out some of
the errors," said Dr. Paul Preston, an anesthesiologist at Kaiser Permanente and
architect of the hospital chain's 4-year-old pregnancy-care training program, in which
Noelle plays a starring role. "We steal shamelessly from everybody and everywhere
that has good training programs." |
Heart Research
Turns to Women. [United
States] Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death
in women over 25, killing more than 250,000 a year in the United States. Before they reach
their 60s, women are less likely than men to develop heart problems, but once the disease
does occur, women often fare worse than men. Since 1984, more women than men have died
each year from heart disease, and though overall coronary death rates have dropped in
recent decades, most of the improvements have been in men. Puzzling differences have
emerged between men and women with heart disease, making it plain that past studies,
mostly on men, do not always apply to women. Researchers have come to realize that to
improve diagnosis and treatment for women, they must sort out the differences. Among the
differences are these: 1) Women with chest pain and other heart symptoms are more likely
than men to have clear coronary arteries when tests are performed, a surprising result
that suggests there may be another cause for their problems. 2) When women do have blocked
coronary arteries, they tend to be older than men with similar blockages and to have worse
symptoms, including more chest pain and disability. These women are also more likely to
have other problems like high blood pressure, high cholesterol and diabetes, which may
make surgery riskier. And they are more likely than men to develop heart failure, a
weakening of the heart muscle that can be debilitating and ultimately fatal. 3) When women
have bypass surgery or balloon procedures for coronary blockages, they are less likely
than men to have successful outcomes, and they are more likely to suffer from bad side
effects. 4) Blood tests that reliably pick up signs of heart damage in men do not always
work in women. 5) Women seem much more likely than men to develop a rare, temporary type
of heart failure in response to severe emotional stress. |
Younger Women at Increased
Risk for Depression After Heart Attack. [India] Women age 60 years or younger are more
likely than other patients to be depressed during hospitalization for heart attack,
according to a study in the April 24 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the
JAMA/Archives journals. Depressed heart attack patients are more likely to be hospitalized
and die of heart problems and tend to have worse health and higher health care costs than
heart attack patients who are not depressed. Identifying patients who are likely to be
depressed after heart attack could help physicians screen and treat those at highest risk. |